måndag 2 november 2009

The Big Ahura Mazda vs The Small Ahura Mazda

Dear Mehran

What strikes me with your Creator is that he is NOT very intelligent or creative. I call him The Small Ahura Mazda.
Your creator needs to plan everything BEFORE he acts (great artists certainly don't). A very slow and conservative old man.
Why don't you believe in a creator who CREATES AS HE GOES ALONG rather than sits for a long time and plans in advance?
Because THEN you would really believe in an amazing and fantastic Creator who looks a lot more like The Creator Science believes in. The Universe develops ITSELF from WITHIN in REAL TIME. It is THAt amazing!!! Planning not needed!
Now THAT is how amazing Ahura Mazda really is!!! The Big Ahura Mazda, infinite, artistic and truly amazing, not the small one who merely designs a block of houses for his obedient children to live in.


2009/11/1 MoobedyAr Mehran Gheibi

Dear Dino
1- Any wise, intelligent, order, such as brain, photosynthesis, gene book, and so on is an evidence by itself. Each of them has proved the existence of a something that is not material but is able of planning and making. Why? Because no component is able of recognizing its best place to sit on, if it is so much intelligent, then there should be a sub-atomic particle that the summation of its properties results in such intelligence.
Is not this an evidence?
2- Every day, science improves itself, new findings results in making new tools and so on. Well is not it possible that one day a tool to be made that be able of measuring non-material= spiritual entities and finds observed evidences of God?

Nik-o shAd bAshid
KhodA negahdAr,
MoobedyAr MehrAn Gheibi.

--- On Sat, 10/31/09, Special Kain wrote:

From: Special Kain
Subject: Re: [Ushta] A question for Moobed Kamran Jamshidi
To: Ushta@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, October 31, 2009, 5:41 PM

Dear Mehran,

The point is that you are the one who has never presented any evidence. And we've repeatedly asked you to do so. But all you come up with is very same question, but never an answer. And, by the way, it's only metaphysics: different vocabularies that do not depict or reveal anything true about the real world. All things experienced empirically are what they are experienced as, so a true belief is known to be such by the consequences of its employment rather than any psychological or ontological foundation.

Ushta, Dino

--- MoobedyAr Mehran Gheibi schrieb am Sa, 31.10.2009:

Von: MoobedyAr Mehran Gheibi
Betreff: Re: [Ushta] A question for Moobed Kamran Jamshidi
An: Ushta@yahoogroups. com
Datum: Samstag, 31. Oktober 2009, 11:25

Dear Dino
You have just written that this is so, that is so, this is not so, that is not so. Well You are a scientist, if you write such paper, does any university accept it, or ask you for evidences?
Is the r any intelligent or not, is there any order or not, is there action and interaction or not? well why such action has this proper recation/interactio n........ ....?
You just jump the matter, but it is not a scientific answer, as you are a scientist and know how should answer in a scientific manner.

Inga kommentarer: